Measurable goals
A goal is specific and checkable. "Will improve organisation" is neither. "Will submit assignments to the shared folder on the day due, in four of five weeks, recorded weekly" is both. The difference matters because a vague goal cannot fail, and a goal that cannot fail is never revisited, which means the student gets no benefit from having it written down at all.
Goals aimed at executive functioning belong here. Barkley places that capacity, rather than attention alone, at the centre of ADHD. A systematic review of executive function in adults with ADHD found the same pattern continues past childhood, which is the case for teaching these skills rather than waiting for them to arrive on their own, because for many students they simply don't.
Specialised instruction
This is the part a 504 plan cannot provide: direct teaching of the skills the student is missing. Explicit instruction in breaking down assignments, planning backwards from a due date, and organising materials, taught as content with practice, rather than expected as a precondition the student is assumed to already have. A student who has never been shown how to break a research paper into stages cannot be faulted for not doing it, and specialised instruction is where that gap gets closed directly.
Services
Written into the document with frequency and duration, so delivery is auditable. Depending on the profile: organisational coaching, social skills support, occupational therapy, or check-in and check-out with a named adult. The frequency and duration matter as much as the service itself. "Coaching as needed" is not enforceable. "Coaching twice weekly for twenty minutes" is.
Accommodations
The same adjustments a 504 plan carries: extended time, written instructions, interval reminders, advance notice of transitions. A meta-analysis of inhibitory control in adult ADHD found consistent differences in stopping an in-progress response, which is what makes transitions and blurting worth naming specifically rather than folding into a general behavior note.
A behaviour plan where emotion is the obstacle
Shaw and colleagues found emotion dysregulation to be a core feature of ADHD rather than a separate problem alongside it. Where a correction can end a productive afternoon, that pattern belongs in the document rather than in a discipline file, because the reaction is part of the disability profile, not a separate conduct issue to be handled with detentions or write-ups.
Preparing for the meeting
The meeting goes better with evidence in hand and requests written down beforehand.
Send requests before the meeting rather than raising them in the room. It gives the team time to prepare a considered answer, and it creates a record either way.
If the team says no
Ask what evidence would change the answer, and ask for the refusal in writing. Both questions convert a decision into a next step, and both are ordinary requests that teams expect.
A declined IEP is not the end of the route. A 504 plan can be agreed in the meantime, and the 504 accommodations guide covers what to ask for there while evidence accumulates for a stronger IEP request later.
Supporting the routine at home
An IEP obliges the school to teach the missing skills. It does not build the daily habit that makes coursework steadier, which needs structure and company more than reminders. A set time and a group provide both, which is what the Learn Daily Check-in is built around, and it pairs with the school-side plan rather than duplicating it.
Where to start
Log homework time for two weeks. Keep three samples of work that show the pattern. Put the evaluation request in writing, dated.
That evidence is what moves a meeting from opinions to a decision the team can act on, and it is worth gathering before the request rather than after. The full picture across school and work is in the ADHD accommodations guide, and the day-to-day mechanics are covered in these ADHD study habits.